
Every FBS team gets a page: last season’s results, returning production, and the schedule with a win probability on every game. Plus the projected playoff bracket, conference orders of finish, and where our number disagrees with the market.
Mountain West · 4-8 in 2025Air Force Falcons7-5 projected · fpi #93 · 92% returningTroy Calhoun, Yr 20
MAC · 5-7 in 2025Akron Zips4-8 projected · fpi #133 · 37% returningJoe Moorhead, Yr 5
SEC · 11-4 in 2025Alabama Crimson Tide9-3 projected · fpi #8 · 40% returningKalen DeBoer, Yr 3
Sun Belt · 5-8 in 2025App State Mountaineers6-6 projected · fpi #109 · 21% returningDowell Loggains, Yr 2
Big 12 · 8-5 in 2025Arizona State Sun Devils6-6 projected · fpi #44 · 23% returningKenny Dillingham, Yr 4
Big 12 · 9-4 in 2025Arizona Wildcats7-5 projected · fpi #34 · 54% returningBrent Brennan, Yr 3
SEC · 2-10 in 2025Arkansas Razorbacks4-8 projected · fpi #47 · 19% returningRyan Silverfield, Yr 1
Sun Belt · 7-6 in 2025Arkansas State Red Wolves6-6 projected · fpi #107 · 30% returningButch Jones, Yr 6
American · 7-6 in 2025Army Black Knights6-6 projected · fpi #89 · 91% returningJeff Monken, Yr 13
SEC · 5-7 in 2025Auburn Tigers7-5 projected · fpi #22 · 33% returningAlex Golesh, Yr 1
MAC · 4-8 in 2025Ball State Cardinals4-8 projected · fpi #134 · 13% returningMike Uremovich, Yr 2
Big 12 · 5-7 in 2025Baylor Bears7-5 projected · fpi #37 · 25% returningDave Aranda, Yr 7
Pac-12 · 9-5 in 2025Boise State Broncos8-3 projected · fpi #50 · 61% returningSpencer Danielson, Yr 4
ACC · 2-10 in 2025Boston College Eagles4-8 projected · fpi #78 · 31% returningBill O'Brien, Yr 3
MAC · 4-8 in 2025Bowling Green Falcons5-7 projected · fpi #123 · 28% returningEddie George, Yr 2
MAC · 5-7 in 2025Buffalo Bulls6-6 projected · fpi #113 · 17% returningPete Lembo, Yr 3
Big 12 · 12-2 in 2025BYU Cougars9-3 projected · fpi #20 · 67% returningKalani Sitake, Yr 11
ACC · 7-6 in 2025California Golden Bears5-7 projected · fpi #62 · 41% returningTosh Lupoi, Yr 1
MAC · 7-6 in 2025Central Michigan Chippewas5-7 projected · fpi #120 · 27% returningMatt Drinkall, Yr 2
American · 1-11 in 2025Charlotte 49ers4-8 projected · fpi #126 · 35% returningTim Albin, Yr 2
Big 12 · 7-6 in 2025Cincinnati Bearcats6-6 projected · fpi #46 · 20% returningScott Satterfield, Yr 4
ACC · 7-6 in 2025Clemson Tigers8-4 projected · fpi #19 · 48% returningDabo Swinney, Yr 19
Sun Belt · 6-7 in 2025Coastal Carolina Chanticleers5-7 projected · fpi #117 · 19% returningRyan Beard, Yr 1
Big 12 · 3-9 in 2025Colorado Buffaloes6-6 projected · fpi #45 · 20% returningDeion Sanders, Yr 4
Pac-12 · 2-10 in 2025Colorado State Rams4-8 projected · fpi #118 · 24% returningJim Mora, Yr 1
CUSA · 7-6 in 2025Delaware Blue Hens7-5 projected · fpi #91 · 69% returningRyan Carty, Yr 2
ACC · 9-5 in 2025Duke Blue Devils6-6 projected · fpi #52 · 32% returningManny Diaz, Yr 3
American · 9-4 in 2025East Carolina Pirates8-4 projected · fpi #68 · 26% returningBlake Harrell, Yr 3
MAC · 4-8 in 2025Eastern Michigan Eagles4-8 projected · fpi #131 · 63% returningChris Creighton, Yr 13
American · 4-8 in 2025Florida Atlantic Owls5-7 projected · fpi #115 · 60% returningZach Kittley, Yr 2
SEC · 4-8 in 2025Florida Gators7-5 projected · fpi #18 · 50% returningJon Sumrall, Yr 1
CUSA · 7-6 in 2025Florida International Panthers6-6 projected · fpi #119 · 30% returningWillie Simmons, Yr 2
ACC · 5-7 in 2025Florida State Seminoles7-5 projected · fpi #28 · 29% returningMike Norvell, Yr 7
Pac-12 · 9-4 in 2025Fresno State Bulldogs7-5 projected · fpi #77 · 49% returningMatt Entz, Yr 2
SEC · 12-2 in 2025Georgia Bulldogs10-2 projected · fpi #5 · 69% returningKirby Smart, Yr 11
Sun Belt · 7-6 in 2025Georgia Southern Eagles5-7 projected · fpi #103 · 29% returningClay Helton, Yr 5
Sun Belt · 1-11 in 2025Georgia State Panthers4-8 projected · fpi #127 · 24% returningDell McGee, Yr 3
ACC · 9-4 in 2025Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets6-6 projected · fpi #48 · 36% returningBrent Key, Yr 5
Mountain West · 9-4 in 2025Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors8-4 projected · fpi #76 · 70% returningTimmy Chang, Yr 5
Big 12 · 10-3 in 2025Houston Cougars7-5 projected · fpi #35 · 56% returningWillie Fritz, Yr 3
Big Ten · 9-4 in 2025Illinois Fighting Illini7-5 projected · fpi #39 · 34% returningBret Bielema, Yr 6
Big Ten · 16-0 in 2025Indiana Hoosiers10-2 projected · fpi #6 · 31% returningCurt Cignetti, Yr 3
Big Ten · 9-4 in 2025Iowa Hawkeyes8-4 projected · fpi #25 · 35% returningKirk Ferentz, Yr 28
Big 12 · 8-4 in 2025Iowa State Cyclones5-7 projected · fpi #72 · 9% returningJimmy Rogers, Yr 1
CUSA · 9-5 in 2025Jacksonville State Gamecocks7-5 projected · fpi #101 · 50% returningCharles Kelly, Yr 2
Sun Belt · 12-2 in 2025James Madison Dukes8-4 projected · fpi #75 · 8% returningBilly Napier, Yr 1
Big 12 · 5-7 in 2025Kansas Jayhawks6-6 projected · fpi #55 · 29% returningLance Leipold, Yr 6
Big 12 · 6-6 in 2025Kansas State Wildcats7-5 projected · fpi #41 · 52% returningCollin Klein, Yr 1
CUSA · 10-4 in 2025Kennesaw State Owls6-6 projected · fpi #106 · 25% returningJerry Mack, Yr 2
MAC · 5-7 in 2025Kent State Golden Flashes4-8 projected · fpi #135 · 49% returningMark Carney, Yr 2
SEC · 5-7 in 2025Kentucky Wildcats5-7 projected · fpi #40 · 27% returningWill Stein, Yr 1
CUSA · 4-8 in 2025Liberty Flames7-5 projected · fpi #96 · 38% returningJamey Chadwell, Yr 4
Sun Belt · 6-7 in 2025Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns7-5 projected · fpi #99 · 48% returningMichael Desormeaux, Yr 5
Sun Belt · 8-5 in 2025Louisiana Tech Bulldogs5-7 projected · fpi #108 · 46% returningSonny Cumbie, Yr 5
ACC · 9-4 in 2025Louisville Cardinals8-4 projected · fpi #27 · 19% returningJeff Brohm, Yr 4
SEC · 7-6 in 2025LSU Tigers8-4 projected · fpi #9 · 26% returningLane Kiffin, Yr 1
Sun Belt · 5-7 in 2025Marshall Thundering Herd6-6 projected · fpi #104 · 49% returningTony Gibson, Yr 2
Big Ten · 4-8 in 2025Maryland Terrapins5-7 projected · fpi #61 · 71% returningMike Locksley, Yr 8
MAC · 0-12 in 2025Massachusetts Minutemen4-8 projected · fpi #137 · 28% returningJoe Harasymiak, Yr 2
American · 8-5 in 2025Memphis Tigers7-5 projected · fpi #74 · 4% returningCharles Huff, Yr 1
MAC · 7-7 in 2025Miami (OH) RedHawks7-5 projected · fpi #94 · 32% returningChuck Martin, Yr 13
ACC · 13-3 in 2025Miami Hurricanes10-2 projected · fpi #7 · 46% returningMario Cristobal, Yr 5
Big Ten · 4-8 in 2025Michigan State Spartans5-7 projected · fpi #65 · 24% returningPat Fitzgerald, Yr 1
Big Ten · 9-4 in 2025Michigan Wolverines8-4 projected · fpi #15 · 49% returningKyle Whittingham, Yr 1
CUSA · 3-9 in 2025Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders4-8 projected · fpi #130 · 34% returningDerek Mason, Yr 3
Big Ten · 8-5 in 2025Minnesota Golden Gophers5-7 projected · fpi #63 · 65% returningP.J. Fleck, Yr 10
SEC · 5-8 in 2025Mississippi State Bulldogs5-7 projected · fpi #49 · 41% returningJeff Lebby, Yr 3
CUSA · 7-6 in 2025Missouri State Bears5-7 projected · fpi #110 · 26% returningCasey Woods, Yr 1
SEC · 8-5 in 2025Missouri Tigers7-5 projected · fpi #21 · 40% returningEliah Drinkwitz, Yr 7
American · 11-2 in 2025Navy Midshipmen8-4 projected · fpi #69 · 34% returningBrian Newberry, Yr 4
ACC · 8-5 in 2025NC State Wolfpack7-5 projected · fpi #51 · 49% returningDave Doeren, Yr 14
Big Ten · 7-6 in 2025Nebraska Cornhuskers7-5 projected · fpi #30 · 49% returningMatt Rhule, Yr 4
Mountain West · 3-9 in 2025Nevada Wolf Pack5-7 projected · fpi #116 · 36% returningJeff Choate, Yr 3
Mountain West · 9-4 in 2025New Mexico Lobos8-4 projected · fpi #81 · 58% returningJason Eck, Yr 2
CUSA · 4-8 in 2025New Mexico State Aggies4-8 projected · fpi #129 · 35% returningTony Sanchez, Yr 3
ACC · 4-8 in 2025North Carolina Tar Heels6-6 projected · fpi #42 · 36% returningBill Belichick, Yr 2
Mountain West · 12-1 in 2025North Dakota State Bison7-5 projected · fpi #100Tim Polasek, Yr 1
American · 12-2 in 2025North Texas Mean Green6-6 projected · fpi #90 · 5% returningNeal Brown, Yr 1
Mountain West · 3-9 in 2025Northern Illinois Huskies4-8 projected · fpi #125 · 28% returningRob Harley, Yr 1
Big Ten · 7-6 in 2025Northwestern Wildcats5-7 projected · fpi #60 · 56% returningDavid Braun, Yr 4
FBS Indep. · 10-2 in 2025Notre Dame Fighting Irish11-1 projected · fpi #3 · 59% returningMarcus Freeman, Yr 6
MAC · 9-4 in 2025Ohio Bobcats7-5 projected · fpi #97 · 23% returningJohn Hauser, Yr 2
Big Ten · 12-2 in 2025Ohio State Buckeyes10-2 projected · fpi #1 · 52% returningRyan Day, Yr 9
SEC · 10-3 in 2025Oklahoma Sooners8-4 projected · fpi #12 · 64% returningBrent Venables, Yr 5
Big 12 · 1-11 in 2025Oklahoma State Cowboys6-6 projected · fpi #54 · 9% returningEric Morris, Yr 1
Sun Belt · 10-3 in 2025Old Dominion Monarchs7-5 projected · fpi #85 · 28% returningRicky Rahne, Yr 7
SEC · 13-2 in 2025Ole Miss Rebels7-5 projected · fpi #14 · 51% returningPete Golding, Yr 2
Big Ten · 13-2 in 2025Oregon Ducks10-2 projected · fpi #4 · 63% returningDan Lanning, Yr 5
Pac-12 · 2-10 in 2025Oregon State Beavers4-7 projected · fpi #98 · 39% returningJaMarcus Shephard, Yr 1
Big Ten · 7-6 in 2025Penn State Nittany Lions9-3 projected · fpi #17 · 15% returningMatt Campbell, Yr 1
ACC · 8-5 in 2025Pittsburgh Panthers7-5 projected · fpi #36 · 44% returningPat Narduzzi, Yr 12
Big Ten · 2-10 in 2025Purdue Boilermakers4-8 projected · fpi #71 · 38% returningBarry Odom, Yr 2
American · 5-8 in 2025Rice Owls4-8 projected · fpi #122 · 30% returningScott Abell, Yr 2
Big Ten · 5-7 in 2025Rutgers Scarlet Knights5-7 projected · fpi #67 · 35% returningGreg Schiano, Yr 7
MAC · 7-5 in 2025Sacramento State Hornets6-6 projected · fpi #111 · 15% returningAlonzo Carter, Yr 1
CUSA · 2-10 in 2025Sam Houston Bearkats4-8 projected · fpi #136 · 47% returningPhil Longo, Yr 2
Pac-12 · 9-4 in 2025San Diego State Aztecs7-4 projected · fpi #59 · 54% returningSean Lewis, Yr 3
Mountain West · 3-9 in 2025San José State Spartans5-8 projected · fpi #124 · 13% returningKen Niumatalolo, Yr 3
ACC · 9-4 in 2025SMU Mustangs8-4 projected · fpi #24 · 48% returningRhett Lashlee, Yr 5
Sun Belt · 4-8 in 2025South Alabama Jaguars5-7 projected · fpi #112 · 46% returningMajor Applewhite, Yr 3
SEC · 4-8 in 2025South Carolina Gamecocks6-6 projected · fpi #23 · 61% returningShane Beamer, Yr 6
American · 9-4 in 2025South Florida Bulls8-4 projected · fpi #73 · 16% returningBrian Hartline, Yr 1
Sun Belt · 7-6 in 2025Southern Miss Golden Eagles7-5 projected · fpi #87 · 8% returningBlake Anderson, Yr 1
ACC · 4-8 in 2025Stanford Cardinal4-8 projected · fpi #80 · 48% returningTavita Pritchard, Yr 1
ACC · 3-9 in 2025Syracuse Orange5-7 projected · fpi #70 · 42% returningFran Brown, Yr 3
Big 12 · 9-4 in 2025TCU Horned Frogs7-5 projected · fpi #38 · 34% returningSonny Dykes, Yr 5
American · 5-7 in 2025Temple Owls5-7 projected · fpi #102 · 36% returningK.C. Keeler, Yr 2
SEC · 8-5 in 2025Tennessee Volunteers7-5 projected · fpi #16 · 41% returningJosh Heupel, Yr 6
SEC · 11-2 in 2025Texas A&M Aggies8-4 projected · fpi #11 · 59% returningMike Elko, Yr 3
SEC · 10-3 in 2025Texas Longhorns10-2 projected · fpi #2 · 59% returningSteve Sarkisian, Yr 6
Pac-12 · 7-6 in 2025Texas State Bobcats6-5 projected · fpi #84 · 51% returningGJ Kinne, Yr 4
Big 12 · 12-2 in 2025Texas Tech Red Raiders11-1 projected · fpi #10 · 48% returningJoey McGuire, Yr 5
MAC · 8-5 in 2025Toledo Rockets8-4 projected · fpi #79 · 9% returningMike Jacobs, Yr 1
Sun Belt · 8-6 in 2025Troy Trojans6-6 projected · fpi #95 · 40% returningGerad Parker, Yr 3
American · 11-3 in 2025Tulane Green Wave8-4 projected · fpi #56 · 32% returningWill Hall, Yr 1
American · 4-8 in 2025Tulsa Golden Hurricane6-6 projected · fpi #105 · 41% returningTre Lamb, Yr 2
American · 4-8 in 2025UAB Blazers4-8 projected · fpi #128 · 15% returningAlex Mortensen, Yr 2
Big 12 · 5-7 in 2025UCF Knights6-6 projected · fpi #57 · 32% returningScott Frost, Yr 2
Big Ten · 3-9 in 2025UCLA Bruins5-7 projected · fpi #64 · 41% returningBob Chesney, Yr 1
FBS Indep. · 9-4 in 2025UConn Huskies5-7 projected · fpi #114 · 2% returningJason Candle, Yr 1
Sun Belt · 3-9 in 2025UL Monroe Warhawks3-9 projected · fpi #138 · 43% returningBryant Vincent, Yr 3
Mountain West · 10-4 in 2025UNLV Rebels9-3 projected · fpi #58 · 31% returningDan Mullen, Yr 2
Big Ten · 9-4 in 2025USC Trojans8-4 projected · fpi #13 · 60% returningLincoln Riley, Yr 5
Pac-12 · 6-7 in 2025Utah State Aggies5-7 projected · fpi #92 · 36% returningBronco Mendenhall, Yr 2
Big 12 · 11-2 in 2025Utah Utes8-4 projected · fpi #31 · 60% returningMorgan Scalley, Yr 1
Mountain West · 2-10 in 2025UTEP Miners4-8 projected · fpi #132 · 19% returningScotty Walden, Yr 3
American · 7-6 in 2025UTSA Roadrunners6-6 projected · fpi #88 · 51% returningJeff Traylor, Yr 7
SEC · 10-3 in 2025Vanderbilt Commodores6-6 projected · fpi #29 · 44% returningClark Lea, Yr 6
ACC · 11-3 in 2025Virginia Cavaliers8-4 projected · fpi #32 · 24% returningTony Elliott, Yr 5
ACC · 3-9 in 2025Virginia Tech Hokies7-5 projected · fpi #33 · 45% returningJames Franklin, Yr 1
ACC · 9-4 in 2025Wake Forest Demon Deacons6-6 projected · fpi #53 · 36% returningJake Dickert, Yr 2
Big Ten · 9-4 in 2025Washington Huskies7-5 projected · fpi #26 · 37% returningJedd Fisch, Yr 3
Pac-12 · 7-6 in 2025Washington State Cougars6-6 projected · fpi #83 · 9% returningKirby Moore, Yr 1
Big 12 · 4-8 in 2025West Virginia Mountaineers5-7 projected · fpi #66 · 18% returningRich Rodriguez, Yr 2
CUSA · 9-4 in 2025Western Kentucky Hilltoppers7-5 projected · fpi #86 · 26% returningTyson Helton, Yr 8
MAC · 10-4 in 2025Western Michigan Broncos8-4 projected · fpi #82 · 54% returningLance Taylor, Yr 4
Big Ten · 4-8 in 2025Wisconsin Badgers6-6 projected · fpi #43 · 38% returningLuke Fickell, Yr 4
Mountain West · 4-8 in 2025Wyoming Cowboys5-7 projected · fpi #121 · 28% returningJay Sawvel, Yr 3ACC · Tavita Pritchard, year 1 · 4-8 last season · No. 80 in our FBS ratings
Tavita Pritchard takes over a roster ranked 46th nationally for talent that still finished 4-8 and scored 18.8 points a game, a gap that puts the burden on Davis Warren to prove the pieces were never the real problem.
Can Davis Warren build any rhythm behind an offense returning just 25.5% of its production from a year ago? The most likely outcome is a rocky first half while new pieces gel around him, since Stanford is replacing this much of its attack in one offseason under a first-year staff, not adding a proven passer into a stable system. The defense, which brings back 69.5% of its production, will have to carry the team through that adjustment.
Tavita Pritchard's first fall on the job hands him a slate where only two games project as coin flips or better, home against Hawai'i and Elon, and everything else is a fight. The trips to Notre Dame and Louisville, sandwiched around a home date with Miami, are the real measuring sticks, three games Stanford is projected to lose more often than not against the class of the ACC and the national landscape. With a middling schedule difficulty ranking of 26 and bowl odds sitting at just 12%, the Cardinal's path to six wins runs through toss-up territory at Duke, Wake Forest, Virginia Tech and California rather than anything resembling a marquee upset bid.
Every team in the FBS book. Each one has its own preview: projected finish, what the roster returns, and the games that decide the season.
Every Premium Issue is included with Major League, or you can buy one on its own. Same treatment as the book you just read: a page for every team, the projections behind it, and the games that decide the season.
The 4-8 mark reads like a wasted year, but the deeper indicators say otherwise. Stanford needed 16.3 yards per point on offense against a 14.1 league median, meaning drives stalled short of the end zone far more than they should have, while a turnover margin of just -4 over 12 games was actually worse luck than performance. Add a defense that gave up points too cheaply at 14.0 yards per point allowed, and Pritchard takes over a team whose underlying play was closer to competitive than 3-5 in league play suggests, setting up real regression toward the better in 2026.
Stanford's offense was the actual problem in 2025, not bad luck, ranking 128th in yards per play and 127th in success rate behind a line that allowed 41 sacks. The fix is a total reset at quarterback, with Michigan transfer Davis Warren projected to take over an offense that managed just 3.02 points per scoring opportunity, a number that has to climb for this rebuild under Tavita Pritchard to look different than last year's. Nothing improves without protection and rushing lanes that simply weren't there, so Warren's success rides on an offensive line that has to be dramatically better, not just a new arm.
Stanford is tearing up the entire quarterback room for new coach Tavita Pritchard, and Michigan transfer Davis Warren is the front-runner to take the first-team reps, though the job is not locked down against Mike Mitchell Jr. and returners Devin Mignery and Dylan Rizk. That turnover follows an offense that scored 18.8 points per game (122nd) and ranked 128th in yards per play, production so thin that even Ben Gulbranson's 1,813 yards and Elijah Brown's snaps walked out the door without much of an offensive identity to replace. Warren arrives with no game stats on record, so the real story for 2026 is whether he can simply push this unit off the bottom third of the country in scoring and sacks allowed, not whether he beats out camp competition that lacks his pedigree.
Micah Ford's 643 yards were nearly the only thing keeping Stanford's ground game upright behind a line that allowed 41 sacks and produced just 86 rushing yards per game, a number that ranked 132nd nationally. Ford returns as the clear workhorse, but Cole Tabb's 445 yards and 3 scores are gone, and the depth behind Ford, Sedrick Irvin's 118 yards, Tuna Altahir's 55, Champ Hampton's 29, offers little proof anyone else can be trusted with volume. Chris Davis Jr. arrives with no stats on record, meaning Ford's health and workload will decide whether this rushing attack climbs out of the bottom tier or stays stuck there in year one under Tavita Pritchard.
Stanford's leading returning receiver caught 37 passes for 414 yards, which tells the real story of an offense that finished 123rd in yards per game. The fix arrived from Yale, where Nico Brown piled up 71 catches for 1,085 yards and 11 touchdowns, a workload that dwarfs anything this receiver room produced last year, including departed target C.J. Williams' 757 yards. Caden High and Marcus Brown give Brown some cover, but replacing Williams and Bryce Farrell's combined production largely falls on a transfer who has never played a snap in the ACC.
Sam Roush and his 49 catches for 545 yards are gone, leaving Benji Blackburn, who managed just 9 catches for 109 yards a year ago, as the clear top option in an offense that ranked 123rd in total yards per game. Chico Holt caught only one pass, and Zach Giuliano, Reiman Zebert and incoming three-star Marcus Monroe carry no prior production, so Tavita Pritchard's first Stanford offense is banking on Blackburn to produce well beyond his 2025 numbers just to keep the position from being a bigger drag on a passing game that finished 72nd in yards per game. There is no proven complement behind him, which makes this room a likely bottleneck rather than a strength in year one.
Forty-one sacks allowed and a 4.74 mark on yards per play last season expose an offensive line that never controlled a game up front, and Tavita Pritchard is not blowing this room up to fix it. Most of the group returns, with seniors Fisher Anderson, Nathan Mejia and Niki Prongos joined by juniors Charlie Symonds and Kahlil House giving Pritchard actual bodies with mileage, even without a known starting five. The fixes up front come from outside additions Jay Miller and Blaise Thomassie inside and Ammon Alexander and Dara Adeyemi at tackle, and whether that infusion of size translates to fewer hits on the quarterback will decide if 86 rushing yards per game becomes a distant memory.
Stanford's line loses its only real disruptor in Clay Patterson, whose 4 sacks and 5.5 TFL topped a group that still finished 136th in pass defense a year ago. What comes back is Omar Staples and Zach Rowell, neither of whom cracked even 3 sacks, so the four incoming 3-star edges, Max Meier, Keysaun Eleazer, Lucas Shanafelt and Sarrel Howard, are being asked to add juice as true freshmen rather than sit and develop. Tavita Pritchard inherits a front that couldn't get off blocks last season and hasn't added proven pass-rush production to fix it, so the pressure numbers likely stay thin again in 2026.
Matt Rose is the whole story here, a 106-tackle, 8-TFL force who returns as the anchor of a group that otherwise loses the modest production of Hunter Barth and Wilfredo Aybar. Tavita Pritchard inherits a linebacker corps that stayed almost entirely intact, with Jahsiah Galvan, Tevarua Tafiti, Ernest Cooper, Zach Johnson and Sam Mattingly all back alongside Rose, and that continuity has to show up against a pass defense that ranked 136th in yards allowed per game. Three-star arrivals Wassie Lugolobi and Chase Cahoon are depth pieces for now, but the ceiling for 2026 rests on Rose and Tafiti turning last year's 59 tackles for loss into more consistent disruption up front.
The back end returns almost everyone who mattered, and that is not entirely good news given Stanford allowed 289 passing yards a game, 136th nationally. Scotty Edwards (54 tackles, 2.5 sacks) anchors the group with Jay Green and Charlie Eckhardt alongside him, but the cornerback room that let that many yards through the air only adds up Brandon Nicholson and Cam Richardson as proven contributors. New coordinator questions aside, the fixes here are largely unproven newcomers, Xavier Harmon and Leroy Bryant (19 tackles at Washington) at corner, plus safety Lasiah Jackson, a 4-star from Lee County. Tavita Pritchard inherits a defense that finished 105th in yards allowed, and until the secondary's new corners prove themselves, the coverage issues that sank 2025 look likely to linger.
Aidan Flintoft is a legitimate weapon, his 43.3-yard average giving Stanford a real field-position tool in close ACC games. The bigger question is who kicks field goals for Tavita Pritchard in his first year running the program: Emmet Kenney made 16 of 21 with a 46-yard long a year ago, and unless London Bironas or AJ Seidler forces the issue in camp, Kenney's leg is the safer bet to stay the primary placekicker. With snapping settled between incumbents Peyton Warford and Alejandro Chavez, this unit's floor is Flintoft, not the kicking competition.
Both quarterbacks who threw passes for Stanford last season, Ben Gulbranson and Elijah Brown, are gone, along with the top two pass-catchers in C.J. Williams and Sam Roush, so Tavita Pritchard is installing an entirely new passing game around Davis Warren, the Michigan transfer projected to start. Nico Brown arrives from Yale with a 71-catch, 1085-yard season already on his résumé, giving Warren an immediate downfield target to replace the production Williams and Bryce Farrell take with them. With only 6 portal additions balanced against 12 departures and a 37th-ranked class, the bet here is that Warren and Brown have to hit early, because the roster was not built to absorb this much lost snap volume gracefully.
Stanford's passing game rests on a receiver who caught his 1,085 yards at Yale, not the ACC, and Davis Warren will be throwing him the ball with zero prior college attempts of his own. Caden High offers a steady complement, but Brown was brought in specifically to replace the production C.J. Williams took with him, and if that jump in competition shows up as a step back, this offense has no proven second option to fall back on.
A minus-4 turnover margin and an offense that needed 16.3 yards per point scored (against a 14.1 league median) both point one direction: this was a better team than 4-8 suggests, and both figures tend to even out. The conference-game splits back it up, Stanford's 37.5% win rate in those games badly trailed what a minus-101.2 yards-per-game margin would predict, so the on-field product was closer than the ledger shows. None of that erases a defense that got scored on cheaply (14.0 yards allowed per point against a 14.6 median), which is the one real hole in the profile heading into 2026.
15 more sections in the full Stanford Cardinal preview — the verdict, every position group, the roster churn and the projected finish.