Stat SavantPremium issuesMy teams
Highlights
Premium issue
2026
FCS
Football
Preview
124 teams, every conference's order of finish, the playoff bracket and a win probability on every game.
124 teams · 147 pages
$4.50 · Free with Major League
Premium issue · Out now
Every FCS team gets a page. The whole season gets a number.
147 pages: a page for each of the 124 teams with its schedule, a win probability on every game and what the roster returns; the projected playoff bracket; every conference's order of finish; and the modules, from the power poll to the toughest schedules.
Read it
$4.50
This issue, yours for the season. Every update included.
$3.99 a month
Major League: this issue and every issue, Stat Savant, Best Bets, unlimited follows.
30-day money-back guarantee on both. Already have it? Sign in and it opens.
In this issue · 147 pages
View FBS Preview · Talk with other fans
Modules · 9
Playoff Picture
p. 1
Power Poll
p. 2
Experience Report
p. 3
All-Americans
p. 4
Position Units
p. 5
Most Improved
p. 6
Bull & Bear
p. 7
Toughest Schedule
p. 8
Conference Rankings
p. 9
Conferences · 14
SWAC
12 teams · p. 10
Ivy
8 teams · p. 23
CAA
13 teams · p. 32
Southern
10 teams · p. 46
MVFC
9 teams · p. 57
Pioneer
11 teams · p. 67
Big Sky, MEAC, UAC
p. 79, 93, 100
Big South-OVC, NEC, Southland
p. 108, 117, 125
Patriot, FCS Independents
p. 135, 146
Teams · 124, one page each
Montana State
Proj. 10-2 · p. 80
Montana
Proj. 9-3 · p. 81
North Dakota
Proj. 9-3 · p. 58
Tarleton State
Proj. 9-3 · p. 101
Stephen F. Austin
Proj. 9-3 · p. 126
Illinois State
Proj. 8-4 · p. 59
Southern Illinois
Proj. 8-4 · p. 60
South Dakota State
Proj. 8-4 · p. 61
MVFC · 9
Illinois State
Proj. 8-4 · p. 59
Indiana State
Proj. 5-7 · p. 65
Murray State
Proj. 3-9 · p. 66
North Dakota
Proj. 9-3 · p. 58
Northern Iowa
Proj. 4-7 · p. 64
South Dakota
Proj. 7-5 · p. 62
South Dakota State
Proj. 8-4 · p. 61
Southern Illinois
Proj. 8-4 · p. 60
Youngstown State
Proj. 7-4 · p. 63
Big Sky · 13
Cal Poly
Proj. 6-6 · p. 87
Eastern Washington
Proj. 5-7 · p. 88
Idaho
Proj. 5-7 · p. 86
Idaho State
Proj. 8-4 · p. 83
Montana
Proj. 9-3 · p. 81
Montana State
Proj. 10-2 · p. 80
Northern Arizona
Proj. 6-6 · p. 85
Northern Colorado
Proj. 4-8 · p. 89
Portland State
Proj. 3-9 · p. 92
Southern Utah
Proj. 7-5 · p. 84
UC Davis
Proj. 8-4 · p. 82
Utah Tech
Proj. 3-9 · p. 91
Weber State
Proj. 5-7 · p. 90
CAA · 13
Bryant
Proj. 4-8 · p. 43
Campbell
Proj. 5-8 · p. 41
Elon
Proj. 7-5 · p. 36
Hampton
Proj. 3-9 · p. 45
Maine
Proj. 5-6 · p. 38
Monmouth
Proj. 8-4 · p. 34
New Hampshire
Proj. 7-5 · p. 35
North Carolina A&T
Proj. 3-9 · p. 44
Rhode Island
Proj. 8-4 · p. 33
Sacred Heart
Proj. 5-6 · p. 40
Stony Brook
Proj. 7-5 · p. 37
Towson
Proj. 6-6 · p. 39
UAlbany
Proj. 4-8 · p. 42
Southern · 10
Chattanooga
Proj. 5-7 · p. 54
East Tennessee State
Proj. 7-5 · p. 49
Furman
Proj. 5-7 · p. 53
Mercer
Proj. 8-4 · p. 48
Samford
Proj. 3-9 · p. 55
Tennessee Tech
Proj. 8-4 · p. 47
The Citadel
Proj. 5-7 · p. 52
VMI
Proj. 3-9 · p. 56
Western Carolina
Proj. 7-6 · p. 50
Wofford
Proj. 6-6 · p. 51
UAC · 7
Abilene Christian
Proj. 7-5 · p. 102
Austin Peay
Proj. 7-5 · p. 103
Central Arkansas
Proj. 4-8 · p. 106
Eastern Kentucky
Proj. 5-7 · p. 105
North Alabama
Proj. 4-8 · p. 107
Tarleton State
Proj. 9-3 · p. 101
West Georgia
Proj. 6-6 · p. 104
Southland · 9
East Texas A&M
Proj. 4-8 · p. 132
Houston Christian
Proj. 2-10 · p. 133
Incarnate Word
Proj. 6-6 · p. 129
Lamar
Proj. 6-6 · p. 128
McNeese
Proj. 5-7 · p. 131
Nicholls
Proj. 6-6 · p. 130
Northwestern State
Proj. 2-10 · p. 134
SE Louisiana
Proj. 7-5 · p. 127
Stephen F. Austin
Proj. 9-3 · p. 126
OVC-Big South · 8
Charleston Southern
Proj. 5-7 · p. 112
Eastern Illinois
Proj. 4-8 · p. 115
Gardner-Webb
Proj. 6-6 · p. 109
Lindenwood
Proj. 5-6 · p. 111
Southeast Missouri State
Proj. 5-7 · p. 113
Tennessee State
Proj. 4-8 · p. 116
UT Martin
Proj. 6-6 · p. 110
Western Illinois
Proj. 5-7 · p. 114
Patriot · 10
Bucknell
Proj. 4-8 · p. 144
Colgate
Proj. 5-7 · p. 141
Fordham
Proj. 3-9 · p. 145
Georgetown
Proj. 4-7 · p. 143
Holy Cross
Proj. 5-7 · p. 140
Lafayette
Proj. 7-5 · p. 138
Lehigh
Proj. 9-3 · p. 136
Richmond
Proj. 6-6 · p. 142
Villanova
Proj. 9-3 · p. 137
William & Mary
Proj. 6-6 · p. 139
Ivy · 8
Brown
Proj. 4-6 · p. 29
Columbia
Proj. 4-6 · p. 31
Cornell
Proj. 4-6 · p. 30
Dartmouth
Proj. 5-5 · p. 26
Harvard
Proj. 7-3 · p. 25
Pennsylvania
Proj. 5-5 · p. 27
Princeton
Proj. 5-5 · p. 28
Yale
Proj. 7-3 · p. 24
NEC · 7
Central Connecticut
Proj. 5-6 · p. 118
Duquesne
Proj. 4-7 · p. 119
Long Island University
Proj. 5-7 · p. 120
Mercyhurst
Proj. 4-8 · p. 121
Robert Morris
Proj. 4-8 · p. 124
Stonehill
Proj. 4-8 · p. 122
Wagner
Proj. 4-8 · p. 123
Pioneer · 11
Butler
Proj. 4-8 · p. 74
Davidson
Proj. 3-9 · p. 77
Dayton
Proj. 6-5 · p. 72
Drake
Proj. 7-4 · p. 69
Marist
Proj. 5-7 · p. 73
Morehead State
Proj. 4-8 · p. 75
Presbyterian
Proj. 7-4 · p. 70
San Diego
Proj. 6-5 · p. 71
St. Thomas-Minnesota
Proj. 7-5 · p. 68
Stetson
Proj. 2-10 · p. 78
Valparaiso
Proj. 2-9 · p. 76
MEAC · 6
Delaware State
Proj. 6-6 · p. 96
Howard
Proj. 4-8 · p. 98
Morgan State
Proj. 5-7 · p. 97
Norfolk State
Proj. 3-9 · p. 99
North Carolina Central
Proj. 6-6 · p. 95
South Carolina State
Proj. 7-5 · p. 94
SWAC · 12
Alabama A&M
Proj. 4-8 · p. 18
Alabama State
Proj. 8-4 · p. 11
Alcorn State
Proj. 5-7 · p. 17
Arkansas-Pine Bluff
Proj. 3-8 · p. 20
Bethune-Cookman
Proj. 6-6 · p. 14
Florida A&M
Proj. 4-8 · p. 19
Grambling
Proj. 4-7 · p. 16
Jackson State
Proj. 7-4 · p. 12
Mississippi Valley State
Proj. 2-10 · p. 21
Prairie View A&M
Proj. 7-5 · p. 13
Southern
Proj. 2-10 · p. 22
Texas Southern
Proj. 5-6 · p. 15
FCS Indep. · 1
Merrimack
Proj. 3-9 · p. 147

UT Martin Skyhawks 2026 Season Preview

Big South-OVC · Jason Simpson · 6-6 last season · No. 54 in our FCS ratings

Rebuilding on defense's back

Jason Simpson's defense, which held opponents to 23.9 points per game a year ago, has to carry a nearly wholesale roster turnover while Tanner Bushee learns on the job, and that math is why UT Martin sits at 54 in the power ratings instead of contending again.

Bushee's supporting cast

Can Tanner Bushee win games when almost nobody around him has done it before? With just 31% of offensive production back, Bushee will be throwing to and handing off to a nearly unproven cast, and that inexperience is more likely to show up as inconsistency than a smooth transition. Simpson's staff can scheme around a green quarterback, but it cannot manufacture the chemistry lost when so much of the skill group turned over at once.

Simpson's Power Five Paydays

Jason Simpson's real season starts and ends with the guaranteed-money trips, at West Virginia and at Memphis, games UT Martin isn't projected to win but has to survive intact for the schedule that follows. The actual conference gauntlet arrives after, at Austin Peay, a game the Skyhawks are given just a 25% shot at, sandwiched between winnable spots against Tennessee State (68%) and Western Illinois (56%). At 5-7 projected against the 49th-toughest slate in the country, the Skyhawks' playoff push runs through how they handle Austin Peay, not the two paycheck games up front.

Sell High on Martin

Last year's 6-2 conference mark came from going 3-1 in one-score games and winning at a 75.0% clip that a -13.2 yards/g margin against league foes says should have been closer to 47.6%, so the correction is coming regardless of who's back. The one real asset is the 98% returning production headlined by Tanner Bushee, and an offense that squeezed only 16.6 yards per point still has room to convert more of that volume into points once it clicks. The 5-7 projection reads right: the roster carryover keeps this from a collapse, but the close-game luck and conference win rate that inflated 2025 are the parts that regress hardest.

More premium issues

Every Premium Issue is included with Major League, or you can buy one on its own. Same treatment as the book you just read: a page for every team, the projections behind it, and the games that decide the season.

2026 NFL32 teams2026 NFL Preview, premium issue32 team pages, every division's order of finish, the bracket and a win probability on every game. Updated every Sunday through the season.$4.50Included with Major LeagueRead the preview →2026 College Football Playoff138 teams2026 College Football Playoff Preview, premium issue
Game emails · free

Your teams, before and after every game.

A preview two hours before the start and the box score minutes after the final. Free, and every email has its own off switch.

Leagues
NFLCollege footballMLBNBANHLWNBACollege basketball

Simpson's Steady Hand

Jason Simpson's crew finished 6-2 in league play, a mark that reads better than the flat 6-6 overall ledger next to it. The gap between that conference form and the middling #54 power rating is the story for 2026: this staff has shown it can win the games that matter most within the Big South-OVC, even when the overall record does not pop. Simpson's league-play form gives UT Martin a real foundation to build on heading into 2026.

Regression Watch in Martin

A 6-2 conference mark hid a group that got outgained by 13.2 yards a game in league play, and a 3-1 record in one-score games papered over the cracks further, so the record was flattering. The offense was the actual problem, needing 16.6 yards per point scored against a 13.9 league median, a sign it left points on the field even while third-down conversions (44.8%) held up. The defense did its part, holding foes to 109 rushing yards a game (9th nationally), but Jason Simpson's team needs the passing offense, 94th at 180 yards a game, to find more explosive plays or last year's conference success does not repeat.

Jase Bauer's 2,002 yards and 10 touchdowns walk out the door, and Tanner Bushee is the front-runner to replace that production after taking the early edge in camp, though Luke Dyer, Hunter Geissinger and Tate Surber are all still in the mix. None of them have thrown a college pass on record, which matters given how modest this attack was last year, 180 passing yards per game ranked 94th nationally and the offense's explosiveness sat at 116th. Whoever wins the job inherits a run-first identity, 163 rushing yards per game and a strong 44.8% third-down rate, so Jason Simpson needs Bushee or one of his challengers to simply not put the offense behind schedule rather than transform it overnight.

Thomas Ansley (565 yards, 2 TD) and Chris Franklin (450 yards, 3 TD) both return to carry a ground game that ranked 49th nationally in rushing yards per game, giving Jason Simpson a proven one-two punch even after John Gentry's 401 yards and a touchdown walked out the door. Boise State transfer Greg Ard adds a power-conference arrival to a backfield that also brings back Moses Adelowo, Javion Goins and Siona Vailahi, none with logged carries yet but all in position to spell Ansley and Franklin. The bigger issue is what surrounds them: this offense ranked 116th in explosiveness, so unless the passing game loosens up, defenses can key on the run and dare UT Martin to hit a big play.

Phaizon Wilson is the one proven target left in this room, coming off 35 catches for 450 yards, and he has to carry a passing game that ranked 94th nationally in yards per game at 180. Bryce Bailey's 37 catches and 5 touchdowns walk out the door along with Scottie Alexander's 284 yards, leaving Shawn Hardy II and Deuce Oliver to grow from bit parts into real complements to Wilson. Signee Tray Moore arrives from Southwind as a three-star addition to the room, but with 1.15 explosiveness ranked 116th, this offense needs Wilson to create the big plays the passing attack lacked in 2025.

Hyatt Timosciek's 18 catches for 181 yards were the room's only real production last fall, and with Drake Martinez's matching 18-catch, 124-yard, one-touchdown line gone, Timosciek now owns the target share at the position outright. Burke Mickelsen, Landon Okla and Christian Stapleton return without a catch on file, so whatever the tight ends add beyond Timosciek in 2026 is unproven rather than replaced. That matters for an offense that ranked 116th in explosiveness and 94th in passing yards per game, since a second tight end who can actually win a matchup is the kind of missing piece that turns some of those third-down conversions into bigger gains.

Nine sacks allowed and a 41.7% success rate tell of a line that kept things moving on the ground (163 yards per game, 49th nationally) without ever threatening anyone through the air, where a 94th-ranked passing attack and a 116th-ranked explosiveness mark point to a group that couldn't consistently create space downfield. That production now has to hold up without Jai'Lun Hampton, Mitchell Appleton, Elijah Bowser, Dolapo Egunjobi and AJ Marquez, part of an eight-man exodus up front. Jason Simpson's offense leaned on its third-down efficiency, 44.8%, good for 21st nationally, to survive a middling ground-and-pound identity, and rebuilding that same push with mostly new faces will determine whether the run game can still bail out a passing attack that ranked 94th in the country.

The run defense stuffed opponents at a 9th-ranked clip in 2025, but that number was built on a front that no longer exists: Jabaree Dawkins, Toby Camp and Polo Mahoni are all gone, taking the bulk of the line's tackle production with them. The bigger issue for Jason Simpson is what was already broken before the losses, a defense that allowed 6.21 yards per play, 99th nationally, with pass protection for opponents holding up far better than the run stop did. Rebuilding the interior push without Camp's presence up front while the back end already leaked yardage through the air is the real problem to solve in 2026, not just replacing bodies.

Jason Simpson's defense stuffed the run to the tune of 109 yards allowed per game (9th nationally) but bled 247 through the air, and now the linebacker corps that helped make that trade-off work is being cleared out entirely. All six contributors at the position are gone, including Shamari Weir and Keyshawn Johnson, who combined for the group's sack production, and Tah Mac Bright Banda, who paced the room in tackles. Whoever steps into those spots inherits a defense that finished 99th in yards per play allowed, meaning the priority is less about run-stuffing pedigree and more about closing the gap in coverage that dragged the whole unit down last season.

The pass defense was the soft spot last season, allowing 247 yards per game through the air and 6.21 yards per play, ranks of 102nd and 99th that stand out against a run defense that held up at 9th nationally. Every name at safety and cornerback who logged tackles a year ago is gone, from Jacob Stevenson and Josh Hastings on the back end to JaMichael McGoy Jr., Chris Rhodes and Doug Newsome outside, so Jason Simpson is rebuilding the coverage pieces almost entirely with an experienced secondary group still on hand and Wayne State transfer corner Wendell Smith folded in to compete on the perimeter. Fixing the yards-per-play number matters more than the raw scoring mark, since Martin's front held teams off schedule only 41.4% of the time and leaned on a defense that still gave up 23.9 points a game despite the run-stopping.

Cade Hechter is gone after hitting 15 of 17 field goals and 72 points, and Jaren Van Winkle's 41.1-yard average on 54 punts walks out the door with him, wiping out both specialist jobs at once. Jason Simpson turns to Ashton Guilbeau and Alex Nolen to settle the placekicking, with Gavin Grant stepping into the punting role, but none of the three carries prior statistics on file, so last season's steady kicking operation is unproven again in 2026. Snapping stays stable behind Hayden King, Jake-Ryan Kruger and Sawyer Phipps, which at least keeps one variable out of the equation while the kicking and punting jobs get sorted.

Tanner Bushee

Jase Bauer's 2002 yards and 10 touchdowns walk out the door with him, and Tanner Bushee steps in with no prior stats on file to prove UT Martin's passing game can hold up. He inherits a real cushion in Thomas Ansley and Chris Franklin behind him and Phaizon Wilson outside, but a 6-2 conference team replacing its whole quarterback resume with an unproven arm is the swing that decides whether 2026 looks like last year or worse.

Jason Simpson's Home Favorite Slump

UT Martin straight-up went 4-1 at home but covered just 2-3 there, and the split gets uglier laying points, going 1-2 as a home favorite. The value has been on the road under Jason Simpson, where the Skyhawks covered 4-3 overall and 3-2 as road underdogs despite a 2-5 straight-up mark away from Martin. Conference games were the profitable lane, a 5-3 ATS mark that outran the 6-2 straight-up record, but a 1-4 cover rate the week after a loss shows this team does not bounce back cleanly for bettors.

14 more sections in the full UT Martin Skyhawks preview — the verdict, every position group, the roster churn and the projected finish.

All FCS team previews

138 team pages, every conference's order of finish and a win probability on every game. Updated every Sunday through the season.
$4.50Included with Major LeagueRead the preview →
Today’s games
Standings & playoffs
Playoff pictureCFP pictureCFB rankingsCFB standingsCBB rankingsCBB preview 2026-27CBB transfer portalNFL scheduleCFB scheduleNFL draft orderSchedule strengthNFL rivalries
Most followed
Dallas CowboysKansas City ChiefsNew York YankeesBuffalo BillsDetroit LionsChicago BearsPittsburgh SteelersGreen Bay PackersNew York GiantsChicago CubsBoston Red SoxNotre Dame
Fantasy tools
Start/sit rankingsLineup checkWho’s playing tonightTrade analyzerWaiver wireYour Sleeper leagueDefense vs positionFantasy playoff scheduleNFL bye weeksNHL schedule gridNBA schedule gridHockey streamers
Betting tools & picks
Odds converterParlay calculatorHedge calculatorExpected valueBet size (Kelly)Teasers, round robinsLine movementClosing line valuePrediction marketsNFL picksCollege football picksMLB picksNHL picks
Read
Top plays last nightPlayer highlightsMLB walk-offsNews WireStat SavantBest BetsNFL preview 2026College football 2026Premium issuesBox Scores newsletterHow it worksHow we get our numbers
Highlights
Major League planInvite friendsPrivacyTermsLog in
Fantasy tools+−
Start/sit rankingsLineup checkWho’s playing tonightTrade analyzerWaiver wireYour Sleeper leagueDefense vs positionFantasy playoff scheduleNFL bye weeksNHL schedule gridNBA schedule gridHockey streamers
Betting tools & picks+−
Odds converterParlay calculatorHedge calculatorExpected valueBet size (Kelly)Teasers, round robinsLine movementClosing line valuePrediction marketsNFL picksCollege football picks
Standings & playoffs+−
Playoff pictureCFP pictureCFB rankingsCFB standingsCBB rankingsCBB preview 2026-27CBB transfer portalNFL scheduleCFB scheduleNFL draft orderSchedule strength
Leagues+−
NFLCollege footballMLBNBANHLWNBACollege basketballToday’s games
Most followed+−
Dallas CowboysKansas City ChiefsNew York YankeesBuffalo BillsDetroit LionsChicago BearsPittsburgh SteelersGreen Bay PackersNew York GiantsChicago CubsBoston Red Sox
Read+−
Top plays last nightPlayer highlightsMLB walk-offsNews WireStat SavantBest BetsNFL preview 2026College football 2026Premium issuesBox Scores newsletterHow it worksHow we get our numbers
Highlights+−
Major League planInvite friendsPrivacyTermsLog in
A Mainmarket brand · 135 York St, Brooklyn, NY 11201 · Not affiliated with any league or team
Betting tools are for information. 21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER.

Scores, schedules, rosters and statistics come from public sports data feeds and are for information only. Odds, projections and win probabilities are for entertainment only and are not betting advice. Team names and marks belong to their owners and identify the clubs we cover. © 2026 MainMarket.com. All rights reserved.

MLB picks
NHL picks
NFL rivalries
Notre Dame