Stat SavantPremium issuesMy teams
Highlights
Premium issue
2026
FCS
Football
Preview
124 teams, every conference's order of finish, the playoff bracket and a win probability on every game.
124 teams · 147 pages
$4.50 · Free with Major League
Premium issue · Out now
Every FCS team gets a page. The whole season gets a number.
147 pages: a page for each of the 124 teams with its schedule, a win probability on every game and what the roster returns; the projected playoff bracket; every conference's order of finish; and the modules, from the power poll to the toughest schedules.
Read it
$4.50
This issue, yours for the season. Every update included.
$3.99 a month
Major League: this issue and every issue, Stat Savant, Best Bets, unlimited follows.
30-day money-back guarantee on both. Already have it? Sign in and it opens.
In this issue · 147 pages
View FBS Preview · Talk with other fans
Modules · 9
Playoff Picture
p. 1
Power Poll
p. 2
Experience Report
p. 3
All-Americans
p. 4
Position Units
p. 5
Most Improved
p. 6
Bull & Bear
p. 7
Toughest Schedule
p. 8
Conference Rankings
p. 9
Conferences · 14
SWAC
12 teams · p. 10
Ivy
8 teams · p. 23
CAA
13 teams · p. 32
Southern
10 teams · p. 46
MVFC
9 teams · p. 57
Pioneer
11 teams · p. 67
Big Sky, MEAC, UAC
p. 79, 93, 100
Big South-OVC, NEC, Southland
p. 108, 117, 125
Patriot, FCS Independents
p. 135, 146
Teams · 124, one page each
Montana State
Proj. 10-2 · p. 80
Montana
Proj. 9-3 · p. 81
North Dakota
Proj. 9-3 · p. 58
Tarleton State
Proj. 9-3 · p. 101
Stephen F. Austin
Proj. 9-3 · p. 126
Illinois State
Proj. 8-4 · p. 59
Southern Illinois
Proj. 8-4 · p. 60
South Dakota State
Proj. 8-4 · p. 61
MVFC · 9
Illinois State
Proj. 8-4 · p. 59
Indiana State
Proj. 5-7 · p. 65
Murray State
Proj. 3-9 · p. 66
North Dakota
Proj. 9-3 · p. 58
Northern Iowa
Proj. 4-7 · p. 64
South Dakota
Proj. 7-5 · p. 62
South Dakota State
Proj. 8-4 · p. 61
Southern Illinois
Proj. 8-4 · p. 60
Youngstown State
Proj. 7-4 · p. 63
Big Sky · 13
Cal Poly
Proj. 6-6 · p. 87
Eastern Washington
Proj. 5-7 · p. 88
Idaho
Proj. 5-7 · p. 86
Idaho State
Proj. 8-4 · p. 83
Montana
Proj. 9-3 · p. 81
Montana State
Proj. 10-2 · p. 80
Northern Arizona
Proj. 6-6 · p. 85
Northern Colorado
Proj. 4-8 · p. 89
Portland State
Proj. 3-9 · p. 92
Southern Utah
Proj. 7-5 · p. 84
UC Davis
Proj. 8-4 · p. 82
Utah Tech
Proj. 3-9 · p. 91
Weber State
Proj. 5-7 · p. 90
CAA · 13
Bryant
Proj. 4-8 · p. 43
Campbell
Proj. 5-8 · p. 41
Elon
Proj. 7-5 · p. 36
Hampton
Proj. 3-9 · p. 45
Maine
Proj. 5-6 · p. 38
Monmouth
Proj. 8-4 · p. 34
New Hampshire
Proj. 7-5 · p. 35
North Carolina A&T
Proj. 3-9 · p. 44
Rhode Island
Proj. 8-4 · p. 33
Sacred Heart
Proj. 5-6 · p. 40
Stony Brook
Proj. 7-5 · p. 37
Towson
Proj. 6-6 · p. 39
UAlbany
Proj. 4-8 · p. 42
Southern · 10
Chattanooga
Proj. 5-7 · p. 54
East Tennessee State
Proj. 7-5 · p. 49
Furman
Proj. 5-7 · p. 53
Mercer
Proj. 8-4 · p. 48
Samford
Proj. 3-9 · p. 55
Tennessee Tech
Proj. 8-4 · p. 47
The Citadel
Proj. 5-7 · p. 52
VMI
Proj. 3-9 · p. 56
Western Carolina
Proj. 7-6 · p. 50
Wofford
Proj. 6-6 · p. 51
UAC · 7
Abilene Christian
Proj. 7-5 · p. 102
Austin Peay
Proj. 7-5 · p. 103
Central Arkansas
Proj. 4-8 · p. 106
Eastern Kentucky
Proj. 5-7 · p. 105
North Alabama
Proj. 4-8 · p. 107
Tarleton State
Proj. 9-3 · p. 101
West Georgia
Proj. 6-6 · p. 104
Southland · 9
East Texas A&M
Proj. 4-8 · p. 132
Houston Christian
Proj. 2-10 · p. 133
Incarnate Word
Proj. 6-6 · p. 129
Lamar
Proj. 6-6 · p. 128
McNeese
Proj. 5-7 · p. 131
Nicholls
Proj. 6-6 · p. 130
Northwestern State
Proj. 2-10 · p. 134
SE Louisiana
Proj. 7-5 · p. 127
Stephen F. Austin
Proj. 9-3 · p. 126
OVC-Big South · 8
Charleston Southern
Proj. 5-7 · p. 112
Eastern Illinois
Proj. 4-8 · p. 115
Gardner-Webb
Proj. 6-6 · p. 109
Lindenwood
Proj. 5-6 · p. 111
Southeast Missouri State
Proj. 5-7 · p. 113
Tennessee State
Proj. 4-8 · p. 116
UT Martin
Proj. 6-6 · p. 110
Western Illinois
Proj. 5-7 · p. 114
Patriot · 10
Bucknell
Proj. 4-8 · p. 144
Colgate
Proj. 5-7 · p. 141
Fordham
Proj. 3-9 · p. 145
Georgetown
Proj. 4-7 · p. 143
Holy Cross
Proj. 5-7 · p. 140
Lafayette
Proj. 7-5 · p. 138
Lehigh
Proj. 9-3 · p. 136
Richmond
Proj. 6-6 · p. 142
Villanova
Proj. 9-3 · p. 137
William & Mary
Proj. 6-6 · p. 139
Ivy · 8
Brown
Proj. 4-6 · p. 29
Columbia
Proj. 4-6 · p. 31
Cornell
Proj. 4-6 · p. 30
Dartmouth
Proj. 5-5 · p. 26
Harvard
Proj. 7-3 · p. 25
Pennsylvania
Proj. 5-5 · p. 27
Princeton
Proj. 5-5 · p. 28
Yale
Proj. 7-3 · p. 24
NEC · 7
Central Connecticut
Proj. 5-6 · p. 118
Duquesne
Proj. 4-7 · p. 119
Long Island University
Proj. 5-7 · p. 120
Mercyhurst
Proj. 4-8 · p. 121
Robert Morris
Proj. 4-8 · p. 124
Stonehill
Proj. 4-8 · p. 122
Wagner
Proj. 4-8 · p. 123
Pioneer · 11
Butler
Proj. 4-8 · p. 74
Davidson
Proj. 3-9 · p. 77
Dayton
Proj. 6-5 · p. 72
Drake
Proj. 7-4 · p. 69
Marist
Proj. 5-7 · p. 73
Morehead State
Proj. 4-8 · p. 75
Presbyterian
Proj. 7-4 · p. 70
San Diego
Proj. 6-5 · p. 71
St. Thomas-Minnesota
Proj. 7-5 · p. 68
Stetson
Proj. 2-10 · p. 78
Valparaiso
Proj. 2-9 · p. 76
MEAC · 6
Delaware State
Proj. 6-6 · p. 96
Howard
Proj. 4-8 · p. 98
Morgan State
Proj. 5-7 · p. 97
Norfolk State
Proj. 3-9 · p. 99
North Carolina Central
Proj. 6-6 · p. 95
South Carolina State
Proj. 7-5 · p. 94
SWAC · 12
Alabama A&M
Proj. 4-8 · p. 18
Alabama State
Proj. 8-4 · p. 11
Alcorn State
Proj. 5-7 · p. 17
Arkansas-Pine Bluff
Proj. 3-8 · p. 20
Bethune-Cookman
Proj. 6-6 · p. 14
Florida A&M
Proj. 4-8 · p. 19
Grambling
Proj. 4-7 · p. 16
Jackson State
Proj. 7-4 · p. 12
Mississippi Valley State
Proj. 2-10 · p. 21
Prairie View A&M
Proj. 7-5 · p. 13
Southern
Proj. 2-10 · p. 22
Texas Southern
Proj. 5-6 · p. 15
FCS Indep. · 1
Merrimack
Proj. 3-9 · p. 147

South Dakota Coyotes 2026 Season Preview

MVFC · Matt Vitzthum · 10-5 last season · No. 12 in our FCS ratings

Coyotes Trust the Model

Matt Vitzthum's group closed 2025 at 11th in the final coaches vote but sits a spot lower entering 2026 in the power ratings, a near-even read that pegs South Dakota as a fringe playoff team again rather than a fading name, with a defense that gave up 26.3 points per game needing to tighten up if the offense's 27.1 scoring pace holds.

Replacing Phillips at Running Back

Who takes over the workload that Phillips carried for two years running, and can that back keep South Dakota's offense from stalling out against MVFC fronts? With that production gone and no proven ballcarrier on the current roster, the answer likely comes from outside the program rather than an internal handoff. Expect the Coyotes to lean on the passing game early while whoever wins the job earns touches, which caps the offense's ceiling until a workhorse actually shows up on tape.

A Gauntlet of Rivalries

The trip to Boise State is essentially a write-off at a 5% chance to win, but the season actually turns on the two coin-flip road trips that follow: at Illinois State (39%) and at South Dakota State (40%). Sandwiched between those is a home date with North Dakota that projects as a near pick at 42%, meaning South Dakota's toughest stretch is packed with league rivals rather than one signature nonconference test. A 7-5 projection says Matt Vitzthum's group should handle the softer MVFC slate at home, but how it fares in that stretch of true toss-ups against Illinois State, South Dakota State and North Dakota will decide whether this team is a playoff contender or a middle-of-the-pack MVFC finisher.

Regression Watch in Vermillion

More premium issues

Every Premium Issue is included with Major League, or you can buy one on its own. Same treatment as the book you just read: a page for every team, the projections behind it, and the games that decide the season.

2026 NFL32 teams2026 NFL Preview, premium issue32 team pages, every division's order of finish, the bracket and a win probability on every game. Updated every Sunday through the season.$4.50Included with Major LeagueRead the preview →2026 College Football Playoff138 teams2026 College Football Playoff Preview, premium issue
Game emails · free

Your teams, before and after every game.

A preview two hours before the start and the box score minutes after the final. Free, and every email has its own off switch.

Leagues
NFLCollege footballMLBNBANHLWNBACollege basketball

A 10-5 mark last season leaned heavily on things that rarely repeat: South Dakota went 6-1 in one-score games and won at a 75.0% clip in conference play that its own yardage margin only supported at 56.6%. Add a turnover margin that ran well in the plus column, and the whole 2025 breakthrough looks propped up rather than built to last. The 7-5 projection reads right given that, and a 12th-place model ranking behind an 11th-place final poll finish confirms it, this is a team whose ceiling in 2026 is last year's record, not a floor to build on.

Vitzthum's Program on Solid Ground

A 10-5 mark with a 6-2 league record and a top-12 power rating is the profile of a program running exactly how Matt Vitzthum wants it. South Dakota did not scrape into that record, it played like one of the better teams in the country at this level, and that kind of results-based footing is what 2026 is built on. Nothing about last fall points to instability, just a coach whose team backed up its numbers on the field.

Vitzthum's Margin Runs Out

South Dakota won six of seven one-score games and still ran the table at plus-5 in turnovers, the kind of double luck that rarely repeats. The offense was legitimately good, 17th in rushing yards per game and 20th in yards per play, but the defense gave up 5.75 yards per play and let 94th-ranked opponents stay on schedule at will. Strip out the close-game breaks and Matt Vitzthum's group was a solid MVFC entrant last year, not the 10-5 team the record shows, and 2026 is where that gap gets exposed.

South Dakota's ground game did the heavy lifting a year ago, with the offense running for 193 yards per game (17th nationally) while the passing attack sat a modest 74th, so the quarterback job was never asked to carry the show. That changes the calculus for Patrick Greisen, the incoming West De Pere product who steps into a system that finished 20th in yards per play and 22nd in success rate largely on the strength of its rushing attack. With Aidan Bouman gone, Greisen does not need to become a high-volume passer to keep this offense humming, he needs to protect the efficiency Matt Vitzthum's staff already built and let the run game dictate terms again in 2026.

L.J. Phillips Jr. is gone after a 1,860-yard, 19-touchdown season that anchored a rushing attack ranked 17th nationally in yards per game, and nobody on the current roster has replicated that kind of workload. South Dakota didn't add a proven ball-carrier to replace it directly, instead bringing in Courtney Rivers from Christian Brothers College and Jahan Abubakar from Lincoln Way West, both unproven at this level. Matt Vitzthum's offense ran at 6.39 yards per play and built its identity on the ground game, so the drop-off from Phillips to an unproven backfield is the single biggest swing factor for whether that efficiency holds in 2026.

Larenzo Fenner's 15 touchdowns and Jack Martens' 33 catches walk out the door together, gutting the group that helped South Dakota post 391 yards a game and rank 33rd nationally in total offense last fall. That passing attack was already just 74th in yards per game, so the loss of Fenner's big-play production stings more than the raw numbers suggest, and Kansas transfer Bryce Cohoon arrives with just 1 tackle on his resume rather than any receiving track record. Matt Vitzthum's offense leaned on a 193-yard rushing attack (17th nationally) last season, and unless someone in an experienced receiving corps steps into the vacated targets, South Dakota's ground game will have to carry an even heavier load in 2026.

Zach Witte's 18 catches and 3 touchdowns walk out the door, along with Dallas Holmes' 8 grabs, stripping the position of all of its production from a South Dakota offense that ran the ball at a 193-yard clip and cracked the top 20 nationally in yards per play. That ground-first identity means whoever settles in at tight end will lean on blocking assignments as much as targets, with the passing game (74th in yards per game) still living through its backs and receivers rather than the seams. The bigger swing factor is quarterback play, not this room, given how efficient the offense was overall at 45.2% success rate even with a middling explosiveness number.

South Dakota ran for 193 yards a game and churned out 6.39 yards per play behind a line that is losing eight bodies up front, including Sam Kohls, Almarion Crim, Caden Ellingson, Adrian Hawkins and Wyatt Lawson. Matt Vitzthum is turning to a high school haul to restock the room, signing tackle Dustin Cochran and interior lineman Deongelo Williams out of Wichita Northwest along with tackles Jake Gau and Parker Maloney and interior lineman Caleb Offner. None of them have a snap of college tape yet, so the run game that ranked 17th nationally in rushing yards per game is being handed to a rebuilt front rather than a proven one, and that gap between last year's production and this year's inexperience is the real story for 2026.

South Dakota's front last season let opponents stay on schedule at a 44.6% clip, a soft spot that shows up more than the middling 26.3 points allowed per game suggests. Every piece of last year's line production is gone, with Caden Crawford, Mosai Newsom, Jeff Bowie, Carter Hooper and Bradley McGannon all departed, so Matt Vitzthum is turning to the portal to reset the edge. Neeo Avery arrives from Maryland off a 3-tackle, 1-TFL season, and Samuel Same joins from Iowa State, and how quickly that pair and Van Meter addition Keaton Mennen can push the pass rush will decide whether South Dakota's yards-per-play number climbs above 65th nationally.

South Dakota's front seven gave up 152 yards a game on the ground and let 5.75 yards per play last fall, numbers that put the linebacker corps squarely in the crosshairs this offseason after Nate Ewell and Nyle Dickel, the group's tackle and disruption producers, are both gone. None of the incoming names, Joey Hardy, Max Clark or Mason Claus, carry a prior stat line, so this reads as a rebuild built on unproven newcomers rather than a like-for-like swap. Matt Vitzthum's defense already ranked just 94th in keeping opponents off schedule, and until one of those new linebackers forces negative plays consistently, that number is more likely to slide than improve.

South Dakota's secondary gave up 215 passing yards a game a year ago, a 64th-ranked number that Matt Vitzthum is patching with outside help rather than standing pat. Kael Kolarik arrives from Iowa after racking up 8 tackles, and Harrison Brun and Ethan Carrier both come in from Minnesota to reinforce the safety spots, while JaMichael Hill joins as a high school signee out of Evans. That group has to cover for the exits of DeJuan Lewis and Matt Walsh, who combined for the bulk of last year's tackle production among the departed backs, and an experienced secondary around the newcomers gives Vitzthum a base to try to push that pass defense number down.

Will Leyland's departure leaves a real void after he made 14 of 16 field goals and piled up 88 points, and Zeke Mata's exit alongside him wipes out the entire kicking operation from a 10-5 team. Punter Tyler Ebel, who averaged 46.4 yards on 47 punts, is gone too, so Matt Vitzthum has to identify new specialists at every phase of the kicking game rather than simply plugging one hole. With that much scoring and field-position value walking out the door, whoever wins the placekicking job carries real weight in a program that went 6-2 in the MVFC.

Replacing L.J. Phillips Jr.

South Dakota won 10 games last year with L.J. Phillips Jr. shredding people for 1,860 yards and 19 touchdowns, and none of that production is walking back through the door. Whoever inherits that workload has to answer for nearly two thousand yards on the ground, and with 10 portal departures against just 6 arrivals, the Coyotes don't have the bodies to simply platoon their way out of the problem. If a lead back doesn't emerge from what's left in that room, this offense stops being the identity that carried 2025.

Vitzthum's Home-Road Divide

South Dakota went 10-5 straight up but the betting market has this team pegged as a different squad depending on the venue. At home, Matt Vitzthum's group covered 60% of the time and won outright six of seven; on the road, backers got burned repeatedly, covering just 14% with a 1-6 mark against the number despite going 4-4 straight up away from Vermillion. The market clearly overcorrects for their road stumbles, since this team also covered 60% against ranked opponents, meaning the number to watch in 2026 is not the record but where South Dakota is kicking off.

14 more sections in the full South Dakota Coyotes preview — the verdict, every position group, the roster churn and the projected finish.

All FCS team previews

138 team pages, every conference's order of finish and a win probability on every game. Updated every Sunday through the season.
$4.50Included with Major LeagueRead the preview →
Today’s games
Standings & playoffs
Playoff pictureCFP pictureCFB rankingsCFB standingsCBB rankingsCBB preview 2026-27CBB transfer portalNFL scheduleCFB scheduleNFL draft orderSchedule strengthNFL rivalries
Most followed
Dallas CowboysKansas City ChiefsNew York YankeesBuffalo BillsDetroit LionsChicago BearsPittsburgh SteelersGreen Bay PackersNew York GiantsChicago CubsBoston Red SoxNotre Dame
Fantasy tools
Start/sit rankingsLineup checkWho’s playing tonightTrade analyzerWaiver wireYour Sleeper leagueDefense vs positionFantasy playoff scheduleNFL bye weeksNHL schedule gridNBA schedule gridHockey streamers
Betting tools & picks
Odds converterParlay calculatorHedge calculatorExpected valueBet size (Kelly)Teasers, round robinsLine movementClosing line valuePrediction marketsNFL picksCollege football picksMLB picksNHL picks
Read
Top plays last nightPlayer highlightsMLB walk-offsNews WireStat SavantBest BetsNFL preview 2026College football 2026Premium issuesBox Scores newsletterHow it worksHow we get our numbers
Highlights
Major League planInvite friendsPrivacyTermsLog in
Fantasy tools+−
Start/sit rankingsLineup checkWho’s playing tonightTrade analyzerWaiver wireYour Sleeper leagueDefense vs positionFantasy playoff scheduleNFL bye weeksNHL schedule gridNBA schedule gridHockey streamers
Betting tools & picks+−
Odds converterParlay calculatorHedge calculatorExpected valueBet size (Kelly)Teasers, round robinsLine movementClosing line valuePrediction marketsNFL picksCollege football picks
Standings & playoffs+−
Playoff pictureCFP pictureCFB rankingsCFB standingsCBB rankingsCBB preview 2026-27CBB transfer portalNFL scheduleCFB scheduleNFL draft orderSchedule strength
Leagues+−
NFLCollege footballMLBNBANHLWNBACollege basketballToday’s games
Most followed+−
Dallas CowboysKansas City ChiefsNew York YankeesBuffalo BillsDetroit LionsChicago BearsPittsburgh SteelersGreen Bay PackersNew York GiantsChicago CubsBoston Red Sox
Read+−
Top plays last nightPlayer highlightsMLB walk-offsNews WireStat SavantBest BetsNFL preview 2026College football 2026Premium issuesBox Scores newsletterHow it worksHow we get our numbers
Highlights+−
Major League planInvite friendsPrivacyTermsLog in
A Mainmarket brand · 135 York St, Brooklyn, NY 11201 · Not affiliated with any league or team
Betting tools are for information. 21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER.

Scores, schedules, rosters and statistics come from public sports data feeds and are for information only. Odds, projections and win probabilities are for entertainment only and are not betting advice. Team names and marks belong to their owners and identify the clubs we cover. © 2026 MainMarket.com. All rights reserved.

MLB picks
NHL picks
NFL rivalries
Notre Dame