Stat SavantPremium issuesMy teams
Highlights
Premium issue
2026
FCS
Football
Preview
124 teams, every conference's order of finish, the playoff bracket and a win probability on every game.
124 teams · 147 pages
$4.50 · Free with Major League
Premium issue · Out now
Every FCS team gets a page. The whole season gets a number.
147 pages: a page for each of the 124 teams with its schedule, a win probability on every game and what the roster returns; the projected playoff bracket; every conference's order of finish; and the modules, from the power poll to the toughest schedules.
Read it
$4.50
This issue, yours for the season. Every update included.
$3.99 a month
Major League: this issue and every issue, Stat Savant, Best Bets, unlimited follows.
30-day money-back guarantee on both. Already have it? Sign in and it opens.
In this issue · 147 pages
View FBS Preview · Talk with other fans
Modules · 9
Playoff Picture
p. 1
Power Poll
p. 2
Experience Report
p. 3
All-Americans
p. 4
Position Units
p. 5
Most Improved
p. 6
Bull & Bear
p. 7
Toughest Schedule
p. 8
Conference Rankings
p. 9
Conferences · 14
SWAC
12 teams · p. 10
Ivy
8 teams · p. 23
CAA
13 teams · p. 32
Southern
10 teams · p. 46
MVFC
9 teams · p. 57
Pioneer
11 teams · p. 67
Big Sky, MEAC, UAC
p. 79, 93, 100
Big South-OVC, NEC, Southland
p. 108, 117, 125
Patriot, FCS Independents
p. 135, 146
Teams · 124, one page each
Montana State
Proj. 10-2 · p. 80
Montana
Proj. 9-3 · p. 81
North Dakota
Proj. 9-3 · p. 58
Tarleton State
Proj. 9-3 · p. 101
Stephen F. Austin
Proj. 9-3 · p. 126
Illinois State
Proj. 8-4 · p. 59
Southern Illinois
Proj. 8-4 · p. 60
South Dakota State
Proj. 8-4 · p. 61
MVFC · 9
Illinois State
Proj. 8-4 · p. 59
Indiana State
Proj. 5-7 · p. 65
Murray State
Proj. 3-9 · p. 66
North Dakota
Proj. 9-3 · p. 58
Northern Iowa
Proj. 4-7 · p. 64
South Dakota
Proj. 7-5 · p. 62
South Dakota State
Proj. 8-4 · p. 61
Southern Illinois
Proj. 8-4 · p. 60
Youngstown State
Proj. 7-4 · p. 63
Big Sky · 13
Cal Poly
Proj. 6-6 · p. 87
Eastern Washington
Proj. 5-7 · p. 88
Idaho
Proj. 5-7 · p. 86
Idaho State
Proj. 8-4 · p. 83
Montana
Proj. 9-3 · p. 81
Montana State
Proj. 10-2 · p. 80
Northern Arizona
Proj. 6-6 · p. 85
Northern Colorado
Proj. 4-8 · p. 89
Portland State
Proj. 3-9 · p. 92
Southern Utah
Proj. 7-5 · p. 84
UC Davis
Proj. 8-4 · p. 82
Utah Tech
Proj. 3-9 · p. 91
Weber State
Proj. 5-7 · p. 90
CAA · 13
Bryant
Proj. 4-8 · p. 43
Campbell
Proj. 5-8 · p. 41
Elon
Proj. 7-5 · p. 36
Hampton
Proj. 3-9 · p. 45
Maine
Proj. 5-6 · p. 38
Monmouth
Proj. 8-4 · p. 34
New Hampshire
Proj. 7-5 · p. 35
North Carolina A&T
Proj. 3-9 · p. 44
Rhode Island
Proj. 8-4 · p. 33
Sacred Heart
Proj. 5-6 · p. 40
Stony Brook
Proj. 7-5 · p. 37
Towson
Proj. 6-6 · p. 39
UAlbany
Proj. 4-8 · p. 42
Southern · 10
Chattanooga
Proj. 5-7 · p. 54
East Tennessee State
Proj. 7-5 · p. 49
Furman
Proj. 5-7 · p. 53
Mercer
Proj. 8-4 · p. 48
Samford
Proj. 3-9 · p. 55
Tennessee Tech
Proj. 8-4 · p. 47
The Citadel
Proj. 5-7 · p. 52
VMI
Proj. 3-9 · p. 56
Western Carolina
Proj. 7-6 · p. 50
Wofford
Proj. 6-6 · p. 51
UAC · 7
Abilene Christian
Proj. 7-5 · p. 102
Austin Peay
Proj. 7-5 · p. 103
Central Arkansas
Proj. 4-8 · p. 106
Eastern Kentucky
Proj. 5-7 · p. 105
North Alabama
Proj. 4-8 · p. 107
Tarleton State
Proj. 9-3 · p. 101
West Georgia
Proj. 6-6 · p. 104
Southland · 9
East Texas A&M
Proj. 4-8 · p. 132
Houston Christian
Proj. 2-10 · p. 133
Incarnate Word
Proj. 6-6 · p. 129
Lamar
Proj. 6-6 · p. 128
McNeese
Proj. 5-7 · p. 131
Nicholls
Proj. 6-6 · p. 130
Northwestern State
Proj. 2-10 · p. 134
SE Louisiana
Proj. 7-5 · p. 127
Stephen F. Austin
Proj. 9-3 · p. 126
OVC-Big South · 8
Charleston Southern
Proj. 5-7 · p. 112
Eastern Illinois
Proj. 4-8 · p. 115
Gardner-Webb
Proj. 6-6 · p. 109
Lindenwood
Proj. 5-6 · p. 111
Southeast Missouri State
Proj. 5-7 · p. 113
Tennessee State
Proj. 4-8 · p. 116
UT Martin
Proj. 6-6 · p. 110
Western Illinois
Proj. 5-7 · p. 114
Patriot · 10
Bucknell
Proj. 4-8 · p. 144
Colgate
Proj. 5-7 · p. 141
Fordham
Proj. 3-9 · p. 145
Georgetown
Proj. 4-7 · p. 143
Holy Cross
Proj. 5-7 · p. 140
Lafayette
Proj. 7-5 · p. 138
Lehigh
Proj. 9-3 · p. 136
Richmond
Proj. 6-6 · p. 142
Villanova
Proj. 9-3 · p. 137
William & Mary
Proj. 6-6 · p. 139
Ivy · 8
Brown
Proj. 4-6 · p. 29
Columbia
Proj. 4-6 · p. 31
Cornell
Proj. 4-6 · p. 30
Dartmouth
Proj. 5-5 · p. 26
Harvard
Proj. 7-3 · p. 25
Pennsylvania
Proj. 5-5 · p. 27
Princeton
Proj. 5-5 · p. 28
Yale
Proj. 7-3 · p. 24
NEC · 7
Central Connecticut
Proj. 5-6 · p. 118
Duquesne
Proj. 4-7 · p. 119
Long Island University
Proj. 5-7 · p. 120
Mercyhurst
Proj. 4-8 · p. 121
Robert Morris
Proj. 4-8 · p. 124
Stonehill
Proj. 4-8 · p. 122
Wagner
Proj. 4-8 · p. 123
Pioneer · 11
Butler
Proj. 4-8 · p. 74
Davidson
Proj. 3-9 · p. 77
Dayton
Proj. 6-5 · p. 72
Drake
Proj. 7-4 · p. 69
Marist
Proj. 5-7 · p. 73
Morehead State
Proj. 4-8 · p. 75
Presbyterian
Proj. 7-4 · p. 70
San Diego
Proj. 6-5 · p. 71
St. Thomas-Minnesota
Proj. 7-5 · p. 68
Stetson
Proj. 2-10 · p. 78
Valparaiso
Proj. 2-9 · p. 76
MEAC · 6
Delaware State
Proj. 6-6 · p. 96
Howard
Proj. 4-8 · p. 98
Morgan State
Proj. 5-7 · p. 97
Norfolk State
Proj. 3-9 · p. 99
North Carolina Central
Proj. 6-6 · p. 95
South Carolina State
Proj. 7-5 · p. 94
SWAC · 12
Alabama A&M
Proj. 4-8 · p. 18
Alabama State
Proj. 8-4 · p. 11
Alcorn State
Proj. 5-7 · p. 17
Arkansas-Pine Bluff
Proj. 3-8 · p. 20
Bethune-Cookman
Proj. 6-6 · p. 14
Florida A&M
Proj. 4-8 · p. 19
Grambling
Proj. 4-7 · p. 16
Jackson State
Proj. 7-4 · p. 12
Mississippi Valley State
Proj. 2-10 · p. 21
Prairie View A&M
Proj. 7-5 · p. 13
Southern
Proj. 2-10 · p. 22
Texas Southern
Proj. 5-6 · p. 15
FCS Indep. · 1
Merrimack
Proj. 3-9 · p. 147

Drake Bulldogs 2026 Season Preview

Pioneer · Matt Walker · 8-4 last season · No. 40 in our FCS ratings

The Spellman Rebuild

Chase Spellman inherits a defense that ranked 5th nationally in scoring last year but must now anchor an offense with just 20% production returning, and a Pioneer contender built on stopping people has to relearn how to score with him at the controls.

Rebuilding Around Spellman

Can Chase Spellman carry an offense that returns just 20% of its production? Nick Herman's 921 rushing yards walk out the door with almost everyone else, leaving Spellman as the lone proven piece for Matt Walker to build around. Given how thin the cupboard is beyond him, the offense will go as far as Spellman's arm takes it, and that bet looks like Drake's best path back to another 7-1 conference mark.

Montana Sets the Ceiling

Coming off a 7-1 conference year under Matt Walker, Drake's 2026 slate ranks 107th in difficulty, but the trip to Montana is the outlier that will define the whole season, a game the projections give the Bulldogs just a 15% shot to win. Sandwiched around that are two more real swing spots, at St. Thomas-Minnesota (42%) and at Northern Iowa (44%), both toss-ups that could easily flip either way. The rest of the board, from home dates with Butler and Marist to a favorable trip to Davidson, sets up a path to the projected 7-4 finish if Drake simply holds serve against everyone else.

Walker's ceiling is fourth

Every fingerprint on last year's 8-4 run points to a team that got more than it earned: the 3-1 mark in one-score games, an offense that needed only 13.1 yards per point against a 13.9 league median, and a 87.5% win rate in conference play against a yardage margin that only projects 60.9%. None of that is built to repeat, and with just 20% of production back, Matt Walker's group is due for correction, not a repeat trip to the top of the Pioneer. The model's own 7-4 call looks generous once the close-game and efficiency luck strip away, so treat second place as the ceiling and a step back toward the pack as the likelier floor.

More premium issues

Every Premium Issue is included with Major League, or you can buy one on its own. Same treatment as the book you just read: a page for every team, the projections behind it, and the games that decide the season.

2026 NFL32 teams2026 NFL Preview, premium issue32 team pages, every division's order of finish, the bracket and a win probability on every game. Updated every Sunday through the season.$4.50Included with Major LeagueRead the preview →2026 College Football Playoff138 teams2026 College Football Playoff Preview, premium issue
Game emails · free

Your teams, before and after every game.

A preview two hours before the start and the box score minutes after the final. Free, and every email has its own off switch.

Leagues
NFLCollege footballMLBNBANHLWNBACollege basketball

Walker's Program Is Rolling

Matt Walker closed 2025 at 8-4 with a 7-1 mark in league play, the kind of conference control that puts Drake at #40 in the power ratings, well above where a Pioneer League team usually sits. That combination of a national ranking most FCS-level peers cannot touch and a one-loss conference slate is the story here, not any storyline about the coach's standing. Drake heads into 2026 as the program other Pioneer League staffs have to catch, built on the identity Walker already has in place.

Spellman Inherits a Run-First Machine

Drake's identity in 2026 runs through the ground game, not Chase Spellman's arm. The rushing attack finished 10th nationally in yards per game a year ago, and that number matters more now that Spellman, who threw just 2 touchdowns against 2 interceptions in his 489 yards last season, is the settled answer at quarterback. The passing game ranked 114th, so Drake's plan is clear: lean on the run, let the defense that held opponents to 17.7 points per game do the rest, and ask Spellman to avoid mistakes rather than carry the offense himself.

Chase Spellman only threw for 489 yards a year ago, a number that looks thin next to a run-first attack that ranked 10th nationally in rushing yards per game but just 114th in passing. That imbalance is the real story here, not a quarterback battle. Spellman is the established starter for 2026, and the offense he inherits was efficient rather than explosive last season, 33rd in success rate but only 76th in explosiveness, which means his job is to hit the occasional throw that turns a good drive into points rather than reinvent the passing game. Vinny Gianforte and Tate Platte return behind him without game stats on the books, giving Matt Walker experienced continuity at the position even as departed passer Xavier Washington's limited work (86 yards, 2 TD) leaves no real production to replace.

Nick Herman's 921 yards and Luke Woodson's short-yardage production are gone from a rushing attack that ranked 10th nationally in yards per game, leaving Jake Metze as the only back with any carries on record, just 67 yards last fall. Matt Walker has to find that lost production somewhere among Cody Blicharz, Parker Borer, Maksym Makota, Ashton Moreno and Luke Thompson, none of whom have logged a stat yet. Given how little proven juice is behind Metze, Drake's ground game likely takes a real step back from that top-10 rushing mark even if the scheme stays the same.

Hank Foley's 18 catches for 308 yards and 4 touchdowns were solid production in a passing offense that ranked just 114th nationally, but Jackson Voth's 48 grabs for 536 yards walk out the door with him, leaving Foley as the only proven target in the room. Walker Tart and Willis Nofsinger combined for three catches between them last year, so Lincoln Delaere and Sam Johnson, both without prior stats on file, will need to become real threats for Drake to push a passing attack that lagged well behind its 10th-ranked rushing game. This offense won games on the ground and on early downs, not through the air, and until someone beyond Foley proves he can win a route, that identity is not changing in 2026.

Drake's tight ends were never the engine of a run-first attack that finished 10th nationally in rushing yards per game, and that shows in the numbers: Cooper Haswell caught just 2 balls for 32 yards, Jake Scobey added 2 for 9, and the room's only real 2025 production, Tyler Nansel's 5 catches for 50 yards, is now gone. Adam Bogenski, Ryan Donnelly, Spencer Halvorson and Vance Hoffmann all return without a catch on record, so Matt Walker's offense still leans on the ground game and a passing attack that ranked 114th in yards per game rather than asking this group to stretch the field. Haswell's modest target share is the closest thing to continuity here, and that is by design for a team that wins with 205 rushing yards a game.

Drake's ground game hummed behind this front, ranking 10th nationally in rushing yards per game (205) even with the passing attack stuck at 114th, and that split tells the story of what this line has to protect for 2026. Four contributors up front are gone, including Kaiden Parrish, Hunter Seelye, Nathan VanDeWoestyne and Nate Henry, so Chase Schutty, Ian Bickert, Travis Gutierrez, Drew Heiss and Will Hendricks carry the load of proving the rushing identity survives that turnover. Matt Walker's offense doesn't need to reinvent itself, it needs this rebuilt group to run-block at the same level while the passing game finally catches up.

Drake's defense held opponents to 17.7 points a game last season, good for 5th nationally, but the line that helped generate that number loses five contributors in Trystan Anderson, Jacob Auen, Collin Schremp, Duke Frye and Shaku Sangarie. Matt Walker rebuilds the trenches around Gene Blalock, Ayden Chabak, Joseph Chavez, Mitchell Grider, Brody Harriff and Hadley Holmes, none of whom carry prior statistics on file, which makes this a projection built on trust rather than track record. The bigger worry sits behind them: Drake ranked just 49th in keeping opponents off schedule, and until this retooled front proves it can win first downs consistently, that number is more telling than the scoring average.

Drake's front seven held up its end of an 8-4 run, ranking 5th nationally in points allowed per game and 13th in yards allowed, even though the linebacker corps that gets rebuilt this offseason loses J.R. Flood, Boyce McIntosh, Tom Shefte and Sean Allison. Zach Adamo, Christian Aguilar, Reed Anderson, Derrick Bunkelman, Louden Huisenga and Chase Lamb all return to carry that production forward, but none arrives with a statistical track record, so Matt Walker is trusting a group that has to prove it can replicate last year's numbers rather than simply inherit them. The rush defense (23rd) and pass defense (25th) were solid rather than dominant, and how these six sort out run fits will decide whether Drake's defense stays in that same range or slips.

Drake's secondary held up its end of a defense that gave up just 17.7 points a game, 5th nationally, even as the pass defense sat a modest 25th in yards allowed. Garrison Codde, Cameron Cunningham, Andrew Eastman, Nicholas Humphries, Karson Kindred and Chase Kluver all return to anchor that group, giving Matt Walker a secondary with real continuity even though none carry logged stats from a unit that stayed more reactive than dominant, sitting 49th in keeping opponents off schedule. Isaiah Bragg's departure clears out the only production on the books, but with six bodies back the ceiling here is less about replacing numbers and more about this group finally forcing the splash plays that turned schedule-staying downs into stops.

Harry Balke made 14 of 16 field goals and racked up 74 points last season, and that production walks out the door along with punter Ryan Schroeder's 36.4-yard average. What Drake keeps is Sam Bruno, whose 41.6-yard average on just 13 punts suggests he can handle a bigger workload if Matt Walker leans on him. The placekicking job is a blank slate between Ben Jameson and Griffin Kollhoff, neither with any game statistics on file, which makes the kicking net the biggest swing factor for a team that went 7-1 in conference play.

Chase Spellman

Drake went 8-4 last year without needing much from its passing game, but that cover is gone with Nick Herman's 921 rushing yards out the door and Jake Metze the top returning back off just 67. That shifts the load onto Chase Spellman, who threw for only 489 yards with 2 touchdowns against 2 interceptions a year ago, now paired with Hank Foley's 18 catches as his clearest weapon behind Chase Schutty up front. With zero portal additions to lean on, Spellman's development from spot starter to full-time answer is the difference between Drake repeating its conference success and taking a step back.

Matt Walker's Road Value

Drake bettors made money following Matt Walker's team away from home, where a 4-2-1 straight-up mark came with a 67% cover rate, including a 67% clip as road underdogs. That road profile stands out against a shakier home slate, where Drake covered just 50% despite going 4-1 straight up. The one soft spot is against ranked competition, an 0-3 straight-up, 1-1-1 against the spread stretch that shows the gap between Drake's conference success and its ceiling against the top of the schedule.

14 more sections in the full Drake Bulldogs preview — the verdict, every position group, the roster churn and the projected finish.

All FCS team previews

138 team pages, every conference's order of finish and a win probability on every game. Updated every Sunday through the season.
$4.50Included with Major LeagueRead the preview →
Today’s games
Standings & playoffs
Playoff pictureCFP pictureCFB rankingsCFB standingsCBB rankingsCBB preview 2026-27CBB transfer portalNFL scheduleCFB scheduleNFL draft orderSchedule strengthNFL rivalries
Most followed
Dallas CowboysKansas City ChiefsNew York YankeesBuffalo BillsDetroit LionsChicago BearsPittsburgh SteelersGreen Bay PackersNew York GiantsChicago CubsBoston Red SoxNotre Dame
Fantasy tools
Start/sit rankingsLineup checkWho’s playing tonightTrade analyzerWaiver wireYour Sleeper leagueDefense vs positionFantasy playoff scheduleNFL bye weeksNHL schedule gridNBA schedule gridHockey streamers
Betting tools & picks
Odds converterParlay calculatorHedge calculatorExpected valueBet size (Kelly)Teasers, round robinsLine movementClosing line valuePrediction marketsNFL picksCollege football picksMLB picksNHL picks
Read
Top plays last nightPlayer highlightsMLB walk-offsNews WireStat SavantBest BetsNFL preview 2026College football 2026Premium issuesBox Scores newsletterHow it worksHow we get our numbers
Highlights
Major League planInvite friendsPrivacyTermsLog in
Fantasy tools+−
Start/sit rankingsLineup checkWho’s playing tonightTrade analyzerWaiver wireYour Sleeper leagueDefense vs positionFantasy playoff scheduleNFL bye weeksNHL schedule gridNBA schedule gridHockey streamers
Betting tools & picks+−
Odds converterParlay calculatorHedge calculatorExpected valueBet size (Kelly)Teasers, round robinsLine movementClosing line valuePrediction marketsNFL picksCollege football picks
Standings & playoffs+−
Playoff pictureCFP pictureCFB rankingsCFB standingsCBB rankingsCBB preview 2026-27CBB transfer portalNFL scheduleCFB scheduleNFL draft orderSchedule strength
Leagues+−
NFLCollege footballMLBNBANHLWNBACollege basketballToday’s games
Most followed+−
Dallas CowboysKansas City ChiefsNew York YankeesBuffalo BillsDetroit LionsChicago BearsPittsburgh SteelersGreen Bay PackersNew York GiantsChicago CubsBoston Red Sox
Read+−
Top plays last nightPlayer highlightsMLB walk-offsNews WireStat SavantBest BetsNFL preview 2026College football 2026Premium issuesBox Scores newsletterHow it worksHow we get our numbers
Highlights+−
Major League planInvite friendsPrivacyTermsLog in
A Mainmarket brand · 135 York St, Brooklyn, NY 11201 · Not affiliated with any league or team
Betting tools are for information. 21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER.

Scores, schedules, rosters and statistics come from public sports data feeds and are for information only. Odds, projections and win probabilities are for entertainment only and are not betting advice. Team names and marks belong to their owners and identify the clubs we cover. © 2026 MainMarket.com. All rights reserved.

MLB picks
NHL picks
NFL rivalries
Notre Dame